美日韩：西方不敢“武力收台”，解放军有巨大缺点，只会纸上谈兵

People's Liberation Army! The international forums engaged in heated debates on this issue. They argue that China's lack of combat experience is a serious shortcoming. After all, many issues can only be discovered in actual combat, such as tactical flaws and weapon performance. Yet, the Chinese military is currently still in the training phase. In contrast, the US military has been involved in numerous wars, with the most notable being the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq. American soldiers he been baptized by war, and their combat experience and individual capabilities far exceed those of the Chinese military. Furthermore, American officers he commanded battles of various scales, and the impact of such experience on the battlefield is significant.

The United States' actions in Afghanistan are not labeled as a war; they are atrocities!

This leads to another topic: international netizens generally believe that China is aware of its own shortcomings. Therefore, the notion of "military takeover of Taiwan" remains confined to theoretical discussions and military exercises. Even if the US were to intervene, they would not dare to engage in a real all-out confrontation. Japanese media claims that the performance of the Chinese People's Liberation Army in actual combat would be abysmal, while South Korean media states that the Chinese People's Liberation Army cannot face its own shortcomings squarely. But is this really the case? It is true that the Chinese military lacks combat experience, but that does not mean the People's Liberation Army is powerless. In the past few decades, China has continuously yzed foreign battlefields, constantly learning and improving its weaknesses.

South Korean President Yoon Seok-yeol

In terms of modern large-scale battles, every country faces blind spots and uncertainties.

Has the United States experienced this? No, they hen't! The so-called battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq can only be described as small-scale security operations. It is more like an bullying children. How much value does this kind of experience hold in the grand game of great powers? The overconfidence of the United States is understandable, but Japan and South Korea dare to make their voices heard? Even if the Chinese military lacks experience, wouldn't fifth-generation fighter jets and Dongfeng missiles be effective? Can't aircraft carriers roam freely? China is more than willing to use Japan and South Korea as practice grounds. Furthermore, saying that China dares not "take Taiwan by force" is simply baseless. Taiwan is an inherent part of China; the mainland and Taiwan are indivisible. So, why would China use military force against its own provinces? In other words, the battlefield should not be within China's territory. If there must be a battle, China could try whether it dares to "use force" in Japan and South Korea!

Putting artillery on ships was the weakest moment of the Chinese ny and a humiliation that China should remember!

Recall the time when "artillery went on board," and they dared to say "no" to American imperialism. What is there to fear now?

以上主旨资料大多来源于网络平台，本文编者一再针对，揶揄任何现实国家，政体，组织，群体，个人。具体数据，方考证于网络平台资料，以上主旨这不代表本文编者相反篇名中的的律法，比赛规则，见解，行为以及对具体资料的真实性负责。本文编者就以上或具体所产生的任何解决办法任何概不负责,亦不承担任何如此一来与间接的法律责任。

。

拉肚子怎么治疗
胃溃疡怎么治疗效果最佳
面部整形
八子补肾胶囊女性可以吃吗
益生菌与肠炎宁颗粒的区别